Blog Articles

Mindful MoneyRIAAWarEthicsAuctionImpact InvestingCyber securitySustainable InvestingResponsible InvestingMarketTimingCoronavirusCovidAiaCignaEthical investingEsgEnvironmentActivePassiveEPAProperty Relationship ActTax returnWearable DeviceArtificial IntelligenceUnderwritingDNA TestingGenetic TestDe Minimis ExemptionFair Dividend TaxForeign Investment FundTax ratesKiwiSaver feesChinaBrightline TestEQCAdvice FeesInvestment feesJunk InsuranceWarrantiesConsumer Guarantees ActRetirement IncomeNew Zealand SuperannuationBridgesFitness CoachingWellnessSally MellorInvestment PropertyTenantLandlordRental PropertyCar RentalCar InsuranceRelationship BreakupProvisional TaxBeanyAccountingTrust DeedBeneficiaryTrust ActTrustSkin cancerProstate cancerMelanomaLung cancerCervical cancerCancer mythsFirst home buyerOpinionFactsSwindlerScamTreasuryVolatilityDollar cost averagingFamily trustsResearchMilfordInvestor confidenceFMAInvestment assumptionsTerm depositsKiwisaver monitoringKiwisaver comparisonStress freeHolidaySecurityBanksTax refundRiskReturnInvestingGreedFinance companiesContents insuranceOwing moneyCredit cardCredit cardsPropertyExpertsBubblesBorrowingLendingFloatFixMortgageLoansInterest ratesFinanceBrokingLegislationForeign superWordingOmbudsmanHouseCoverContentsBalanced fundSchooling costsEducationCredit ratingsTradingSecondary marketTerminologyFixed interest investmentFixed InterestLegalGuarantorUk pensionPension transferSpendingChristmasConsumer behaviourUK Pension TransfersQROPsInvesmtentWays to dieInsurance claimsWinz#residential care#assetsTrustsResidential care subsidy#residentialcaresubsidy#gifting#familytrustsSavingsLottery#bonusbondsSpecific injuryCase stuffyTrust expensesEstate planningAsset protection#trust#family Trust#incomeprotectioninsurance#incomeAdriennes storyQuizLife expectancyLVR ratioHouse depositBorrowing to buy a house#firsthomebuyerKiwisaver returns#kiwisaver feesReitrement savingsFirst home buyersUncategorized#financialplanningPersonal financesFinancial management#personalfinances#mortgages#finances#fidelity#kiwisaverperformance#redundancy insurance#incomeinsuranceRetirement ageJohn KeyFirst home buyer withdrawalKiwisaver rulesFirst home buyer grantUnclaimed moneyMoney refundsPortability superBringing home KiwiSaver#australia KiwiSaverInsurance #insurance#homeinsurance#liability#insurance claim. Insurance claim#income insurance protectionFirst home grantDumb ways to dieUnder 18 years oldTax creditTrans-tasmanPortabilityAustraliaAsteronRisk profilesMoving funds#changing kiwisaver managersInvestment returnsTibTerminal illness benefit#claim#sil#kiwisaver analysis#shares#mighty river power#electricity#partners lifeTrusteeSafety of KiwiSaverFunBeerCredit ratingBad debtTax rebateInvestment advice#retirement planningLapseExpensesFighting fundEmergency cashRipping off elderlyFinancial planingPass backUnit pricingGareth morgan#Medical Assurance Society#MAS#investment analysis#travel insurance#insurance claimFinancial planningBudgettingReporting#insurance commissionInsurance commissions#commissions#career in insuranceSouthern crossClaimingInsurance excessesRussiaJohn clarkeHumourGfcCyprusHome insuranceEarthquakesCrisisStand down periodPolicy wordingChurningContributions holidayTaxesPayrollEmployer contributionsEsctEmployee contributionContribution holidaySil kiwisaver. westpacKwiisaverBitAsset allocationAsbAnzAwarenessReturnsPerformanceProstate canerWillsRelationship PropertyPlanningLegal AgreementsLawyersDivorcePremiumsTowerFund ManagersFisherKiwibankDefault schemesBnzAMPPetsPet insuranceMoney managementBudgetsHouse insuranceFire and general insuranceAccChilds trauma insuranceChilds traumaProtectionFund managerClaim trauma insuranceTotal and Permanent Disablement InsuranceOnePath LifeClaimsSmokingSmokers ratesInsurance researchInsurance analysisImageFree quotesSavingMoneyInfographicInflationVideoTpd insuranceTPDSovereignDisabilityCase StudyAxaHeart attackLoveIncome protectionCancer insuranceBreast cancerTerranovaMinimum wageEmployer contributionTraumaIncome protection insuranceCancerSortedRisk profileRetirementOnepathInvestmentsWestpacBTWho can joinRetirement savingsFuneral plannerFuneralDyingDeathTrauma insuranceLife InsuranceInsurance News & ViewsInsuranceIncome insuranceHealth insuranceDisability insuranceUS citizenRetiring to live in new zealandInvestmentFATCAReturning to new zealandRetiring in new zealandMember tax creditKickstartTransitional residentTaxationRetiring to new zealandNew migratnFifFdrDe minimisSuperannuationRetiringNZ superannuationNew zealandEligibility for NZ SuperMorningstarInvestment ReturnInvestment performanceFund sizeFeesTaxPIRPIEMoney News & ViewsIrdMinimum contributionKiwiSaver News & ViewsKiwiSaverContributions1 April 2013
TAGS

Should adult children be able to challenge their parents wills?

Should Adult Children be able to challenge their parent’s wills?

You will have seen the headlines in the media about families at war over their parent’s wills.  The arguments of the Green family (https://www.stuff.co.nz/business/industries/82480390/divorce-possible-in-family-of-business-magnate-hugh-green) , the saga of the Supreme Court Judge (Robert Chambers) and the issues with their blended families (https://www.stuff.co.nz/business/money/92972957/where-theres-a-will-theres-a-way-to-challenge-it), are just two examples of how the Courts have been used to challenge a will made in good faith by parents.

The current succession laws enable children to challenge their parents wills through the courts if they feel that they have been treated badly.  While these laws were originally established to make sure that young children were properly provided for, adult children have been able to dispute a will if they feel that they have been treated unfairly.  At law school, we learn that this is about ‘the recognition of the family bond’ (and there are a number of cases where this has been canvassed.

The Law Commission review of succession laws

A key role of the Law Commission is proposing changes to our laws. They undertake a review, call for submissions and make recommendations to the Government.  The Government can then choose how much or how little of those recommendations to implement, this is the process that saw the major changes to our Trust laws, codifying the case law that had been built up over the year, and making it clearer what Trustees responsibilities are.

The Law Commission is currently undertaking a review of the succession laws in New Zealand, and the terms of reference included consideration of:

  • who should be entitled to claim property despite what the deceased said in their will, with a particular focus on a surviving spouse or partner and other members of the deceased’s family.
  • who should be entitled to share in property when a person dies without a will, with a particular focus on a surviving spouse or partner and other members of the deceased’s family.
  • what the policy justifications should be for such entitlements.
  • what property should be available to meet entitlements.
  • how succession law should address areas of particular concern to Māori.
  • ancillary and procedural matters.

The review will impact a number of Acts, including the Administration Act, Property (Relationships) Act and the Family Protection Act. At present, the Administration Act stipulates what happens to the money if someone dies intestate (without a will), and divides the money up between parents, childrens and spouses according to a specified formula.

The issue of whether adult children should be able to overturn a parents drafted will has had specific focus from commentators with an excellent article in Newsroom (available at https://www.newsroom.co.nz/adults-snubbed-by-parents-wills-may-lose-right-to-contest ).

Particular questions that are being asked as part of the full review are:

Should a person be able to get rid of their property in exactly the way they choose? Should family members have rights to protect themselves against disinheritance?

As the Newsroom article points out – if an adult child challenges a will there are ‘a wealth of subjective factors that can affect any decision’ which makes it difficult for a judge to make a decision about what an adult child should get from an estate. For example “What if the deceased had helped the child financially during their lifetime?” the Commission asked in a recent press release. “What if the deceased and the child had fallen out? What if the deceased wished to support charitable causes because their children are financially secure?”

On the other hand, as pointed out by a senior law lecturer – what if someone has left all their assets to charity despite having a child who may be disabled, or otherwise reliant on the state?

If you are interested in more information about the review, the Law Commissions Issue Paper is on the link below



 

This product has been added to your cart

CHECKOUT